2nd Amendment Speech Essay Example For Students

2nd Amendment Speech Essay Outline4/19/99Tyree White emailprotectedSpecific Goals: I want to encourage gun ownership. IntroductionI. What is the foundation of modern technology? Its the history of the gun. Thesis Statement: I will persuade you in that, (1) federal gun control laws are unconstitutional, and (2) Iwill prove the 2nd Amendment is both a State and Individual Right.BodyI.The foundation of our country is based in English Bill of Rights and the American Revolution. A. What is the difference between the Declaration of Independence, the U. S. Constitution andthe Bill of Rights?1. The Declaration of Independence gives the reasons, as to why America wanted seperation. 2. The Constitution gives the federal government certain powers. 3. The Bill of Rights limited the power of the federal government. B. The views of gun control advocates. 1. Gun control saves lives. 2. When America was founded guns only shot one bullet at a time. 3. Gun control will keep guns out of the hands of criminals. 4. Children should not have guns. 5. Gun control will reduce the hazards to law enforcement. 6. If citizens carry guns, there will be daily shoot-outs in the streets. 7. We dont want to ban deer rifles, just assault rifles. 8. Why do you need an assault rifle?9. The entertainment industry is not at fault, its the guns fault! 10. The 2nd is a collective right and not an Individual Right.C. My rebuttal to gun control advocates. 1. Vehicle control saves more lives than gun control. 2. The musket was an assault rifle, like the AK-47 is today. 3. If you dont want criminals to have guns, keep them behind bars. 4. As a child I had guns, and I came out ok. 5. Law enforcement is often the problem, remember Rodney King. 6. Crime has gone down in States with right to carry laws. 7. The Violence Policy Center wants to vilify the deer rifle. 8. Who knows what the future holds? Do you remember Hilter? The economic fall-out of 1929?9. The guns fault? Could it be society has been socially conditioned, into violence behavior? 10. The 2nd is both a State and Individual Right. (historical)II. I defy my opponents to show in the Bill of Rights where it bars any particular type of firearm. A. I lawfully purchased the AK-47, with in the frame-work of the Constitution. The federal government allowed it to be imported. The State of Texas allowed it to be sold, thus making its ownership Constitutional. (legal) B. My views are better than my opponents views, because the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights is intended to limit the power of the federal government, and not that of the States. (constitutional) C. Not only does the 2nd Amendment give the power to the States, but it also gives, an Individual Right as indicated by the words the people. (language)III. My call to Action. A. Protect your gun rights. 1. Join the National Rifle Association. 2. Vote for pro-2nd Amendment candiates. 3. Write your representitivies in favor of the 2nd Amendment. B. Take Responsibility for your life, liberty, and happiness, go buy a GUN. ConclusionI. The 2nd Amendment did not get into the Bill of Rights by accident. It was put there to give thepeople the final say in our governments system of checks and balances. BibliographySchmidt, Shelley, and Bardes AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS TODAYWest Publishing Company, 1991-92. Adams, Les The Second Amendment Primer Odysseus Editions, 1996. C.Q. Researcher from Temple College Library, June 10, 1994. From the Internet, The National Rifle Association, Handgun Control Inc., Violence Policy Center,The Department of Transportation, The Journal of Firearms and Public Policy, and Gun Owners of America. What does Lenin, Stalin, Hilter, Mussolini, Idi Amin, Mao tse-tung, and Pol Pot have in common? When they came to power, they took all guns from the civilian population. For this reason my specific goal is to encourage gun ownership. Introduction: The gun 1st appeared in Europes literature in 1326. It evolved into a mechanical tool as no other tool before it, it incorporated different materials like wood and metal, it also involved physics, chemistry and had ignition. Thus, making the gun the foundation of modern technology, not to mentionthe fact it gave America its freedom.The shot that was heard around the World April 19,1775. In 1689 the English Bill of Rights, was passed by Parliament in responsed to King James II trying to disarm his subjects. The English Bill of Right allowed the people to be armed suitable to their conditionand allowed by law. This Right was then transfered to the American colonies, and after the AmericanRevolution, our Bill of Rights of 1791, further strengthed the Right to Bear Arms with the words the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Thesis Statement: I will persuade you in that, (1) federal gun control laws are unconstitutional, and (2) Iwill prove that the 2nd Amendment is both a State and Individual Right. Can any of you tell me the difference between the Declaration of Independence, the United StatesConstitution, and the Bill of Rights? Lets start with the Declaration of Independence.What was the pur-pose of the Declaration of Independence? It outlined the reasons as to why the 13 colonies wanted sep-eration from Britian. What does the United S tates Constitution do? It outlines the federal government and gives it certain powers, these powers are stated within the document itself. What does the Bill of Rights do? (the Rights of the Individual). It limits the power of the federal government. How does the Bill of Rights limit the power of the federal government? Well, let me 1st give you an example. Can the federal government establish a federal religion? No! Why not? Because the 1st Amendment prohibits it. Lets look at the 1st Amendment. It says in part. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of rel-igion. Thus the Bill of Rights forbids the federal government in the establishment of a federal religion. So lets use a little common sense, if the federal government can not establish a federal religion. Howcan it establish gun control? It cant, the 2nd Amendment forbids it, just like the 1st Amendmentforbids a federal religion. Lets look at the 2nd Amendment, A well regulated militia, being necessaryto the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Now lets move to the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights, it states that the Constitution gives the federal government certain powers and only those powers listed in the Constitution. Whatever poweris left over is reserved to the States. Thus, the 2nd Amendment takes gun control from the federal gov-ernment and the 10th Amendment puts the gun issue in the hands of the States. Lets look at the 10thAmendment, it says: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, norprohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. By the reaso ning of common sense, it is therefore unconstitutional for the federal government to passgun control measures, because the 2nd Amendment restricts the federal government and the 10th Amendment gives that power to the States. Thus, the States have a right to reasonably regulate firearmsfrom criminals but not deny Individual law abiding gun ownership. (The words the people refer to individuals.) The Delclaration of Independence proves the Individuals view, it says in part We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty (freedom), and the Pursuit of Happiness. Family History And Its Effects On Children Essay So what is reasonable firearm ownership? Well, what ever type of firearms that police and swat teamsuse, these same weapons can be owned by Individual Citizens, thus creating equality between the Citizenand the law enforcer. Known as a balance of power. Furthermore the government (state or federal) can not make the firearm owner use Smart Gun Techology, because it would create an imbalance of power. Doto the ability of government turning off or destroying the Citizens firearms, via satellite, magnetism, laseror some other means. Finally, technology can never replace sound, commonsence gun safety. All legislative mandates wont make guns safer. But they may led some people into the false sense of security and a lax disregard for the rules of firearms safety. My call to Action: Protect your gun rights, join both the National Rifle Association and Texas State Rifle Association.Vote for pro-2nd Amendment candiates.Write your representivities in favor of the 2nd Amendment,and take Responsibility for your life, liberty, and happiness, go buy a GUN. In conculsion the 2nd Amendment did not get in the Bill of Rights by accident. It was put there to give the people the final say in our governments system of checks and balances. The people are the final check in the system, 1st by the vote, and if the vote is subverted then by the gun. Finally, I would like to end my speech with Patrick Henrys famous quote. I know not whatcourse others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death, if this be treason, makethe most of it.BibliographySchmidt, Shelly, and Bardes AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS TODAYWest Publishing Company, 1991-92. Adams, Les The Second Amendment Primer Odysseus Editions, 1996. C. Q. Researcher from Temple College Library, June 10, 1994. From the Internet, The National Rifle Association, Handgun Control Inc., Violence Policy Center,The Department of Transportation, The Journal of Firearms and Public Policy, and Gun Ownersof America. Questions for discussion. 1. From a historical point of view what was the Framers intent?2. Who is the Bill of Rights refering to when it uses language like the people?3. When we look at the 2nd Amendment what does past practice indicate?4. Is the Bill of Rights a living document or a concrete document? 5. When interpreting the Bill of Rights does one give a consistant interpretation to all Ten Amendments?6. What is the difference between a privilege and a RIGHT?7. Does one discount the 2nd Amendment because they feel it is no longer necessary?8. Since we licences car owners. Why not licences gun owners?9. As of today are Americans more familiar with cars or guns? Answers to discussion questions. 1. Individual gun ownership, the minuteman militia. The National Guard did not exist until 116 years after the 2nd Amendment was adopted. 2. The Individual. U.S. vs. Verdugo-Urquidez3. Individual gun ownership.4. A concrete document, that can only be changed with 3/4 vote of the States. If you say the Constitution is a living document, then I want to play you a living game of poker, by my living/changing rules. 5. Yes, if one reads one Amendment with a strong interpretation, then one must read all Amendments with a strong interpretation. 6. A privilege is something that is given (a favor), a RIGHT is innate. 7. NO! But if you feel the answer is yes. Then who will decide what part of the Bill of Rights is no longer necessary? The elites (U.N.) propaganda? I hope not. 8. Americans have a Constitutional Right to own a gun, and no constitutional right to own a car. 9. Cars of course. In 1791 over 99.9% of American were more familiar with the gun. The 2nd Amen- dment has not changed since 1791. So lets make Americans as familiar with the gun as they are with the car. Thus we will keep America a Constitutional and Freedom loving country.Self Defence is a HUMAN RIGHT!!!When the government fears the People, it is called Liberty. When the People fear the government itis called tyranny.